BRING OUR LOUISVILLE FIRE FAMILIES BACK!


Target: 2500
Signatories:
2250
Start petition: 2022-10-23 14:07:25

#LOUISVILLE   #FAMILIES   

**please note that any contributions made here remain with officialpetitions.org and are used to promote petition**

The Marshall Fire burned 550 homes in Louisville, traumatically displacing 6% of the community. According to the Department of insurance, the vast majority of fire survivors that lost their homes in the Marshall Fire are underinsured at an average amount of $242,000. Those families must make up huge financial shortfalls in order to get back what they lost, in order to rejoin their community.


Those rebuilding after losing homes in Louisville must pay 2.7 times what residents in Superior pay and 1.6 times what residents in Unincorporated Boulder County pay at permitting. Because the fees and taxes that Louisville charges are so excessive, many long time Louisville residents will be pushed out of the community. Some of those residents raised their children and planned to live out their retirement in their homes. 


Very little of the money collected at permitting is connected to a City service related to rebuilding the homes that burned. Despite that, some of the Louisville elected government has expressed an interest in holding onto the windfall revenues from families rebuilding to pay for the damages incurred to the City of Louisville as a whole due to the fire, including: damage to roads and sidewalks, the recreation center, the golf course, and water infrastructure.

The fire victims did not cause the Marshall Fire, and they should not be disproportionately held responsible to pay for it. Why would Louisville seek to collect revenue for City-wide repairs only from the people that lost everything they own in the fire? Only six percent of Louisville lost their homes in the fire, but fairness would dictate that ALL OF LOUISVILLE pays for City-wide repairs. As it presently stands, most families that lost homes face $22 to $37K in permitting costs that will be primarily used to fund City fire repairs. Those that had no fire or smike damage to their homes pay zero.


The largest expense at permitting the Louisville use tax, which will cost between $13K and $23K for most families that lost homes. The use tax was designed to raise money from new home builds for the recreation center, open space and historical preservation society. The use tax was never intended to be levied against homeowners rebuilding their homes after a loss. The Town of Superior moved quickly to rebate use taxes and permit fees after the fire for these reasons. The Louisville families that lost homes in the fire should not be forced to take out new loans and dig into their retirement savings to afford these excessive City taxes and fees. 


We demand that our elected Louisville government:


1) Provide a 100% use tax rebate for fire survivors that rebuild. If the elected government will not agree to pass a use tax rebate, then we demand that City Council put a use tax rebate on the ballot so that the voters of Louisville can decide. 


2) Rebate all further fees and taxes collected at permitting that will not be used to provide services related to rebuilding fire survivor’s houses.

Step 1:

Sign it


Step 3:

Share this petition



Last Comments

Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-10-02 02:42:38 )

Dazzling examples!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-09-19 02:22:54 )

You are a snappy problem-solver!
Presendor Presendieu   ( 2022-08-17 04:23:32 )

The way you express your ideas is wonderful!
Jo Ann Moore   ( 2022-09-30 07:59:52 )

You make a great point here!
Karen Hansen   ( 2022-07-23 02:23:29 )

I admire you!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-09-02 15:59:36 )

You express your ideas so well!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-07-17 20:44:13 )

You are so smart!
Linda Bragg Rollins   ( 2022-07-30 07:10:59 )

This is clever!
Lori Dunkin Hines   ( 2022-08-07 19:39:40 )

This is top-notch!
Chuck Nyla Thornton   ( 2022-07-26 20:24:29 )

You should be proud of this work!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-08-26 00:06:58 )

I love reading your essays!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-07-18 20:03:59 )

Great thinking!
Pam Koome   ( 2022-08-27 03:22:30 )

What a terrific learner you are!
Cathy Myerholtz   ( 2022-07-20 11:09:22 )

You are very preceptive!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-07-31 18:17:52 )

Your handwriting is just lovely!
Selene Hutchison Zuffi   ( 2022-10-05 02:59:07 )

What a wonderful assignment!
Judith Erickson   ( 2022-08-21 00:31:55 )

I admire you!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-09-22 04:55:06 )

I feel privileged to have gotten to read this work! Great effective paper!
Mary Hand   ( 2022-09-09 16:52:22 )

This is not just a sheet of paper. Its wonderful work!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-07-23 08:01:19 )

Terrific persuasive argument!
Paula Swengel   ( 2022-09-05 01:57:38 )

You are unstoppable!
Nurul Huda Osman   ( 2022-10-02 18:34:30 )

Your handwriting is just lovely!
Erc Alison Thomas   ( 2022-08-07 06:28:35 )

This part moved me!
Carol Crosby   ( 2022-09-15 15:19:17 )

You were very clear, concise, and complete!
Lila Chardès   ( 2022-09-22 22:58:38 )

I like the way you tackled this assignment!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-08-16 12:20:09 )

This is very well thought out!
Anonymous commenter   ( 2022-08-01 06:39:40 )

You have great ideas!
Solo Keren   ( 2022-08-14 18:44:48 )

This is quality work!
David Abayev   ( 2022-08-20 23:35:51 )

Youve come a long way!
Frederick V Ferrell   ( 2022-09-06 18:37:03 )

This paragraph is brilliant!

Top 10 donaters

Shirley Estruch: 186 $
( 2022-08-09 06:37:27 )
Sunph Pbr: 151 $
( 2022-08-04 00:02:52 )
Sylvia McCormick: 141 $
( 2022-08-07 08:37:56 )
Ruth Ross: 113 $
( 2022-09-23 23:55:56 )
Anonymous donater: 82 $
( 2022-09-12 16:54:12 )
Chester C Farley: 78 $
( 2022-07-30 01:17:32 )
Nicole Flood Lorber: 75 $
( 2022-10-05 01:21:40 )
Erika Kane: 67 $
( 2022-09-04 12:51:51 )
Marie Edwards: 40 $
( 2022-08-22 14:56:14 )
Mohammad Shoyeb: 37 $
( 2022-09-25 05:47:03 )

Contact